How the city
slickers and politicians must be sitting back and rubbing their hands with glee
as their bank accounts, influence, and power to dictate how the masses, you and
I, live their lives, swells day by day.
Not
surprisingly governments have rushed to the fore to claim their share of the
prize, but consider this: The Ice Cores
prove that carbon dioxide follows 800 years – 2,000 years behind rises in
temperature, a point conceded in an English Court of Law by the makers of the
sci-fi horror movie, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’.
Just a few decades
ago it was widely believed that CO2 remained in the
atmosphere for hundreds of years and accumulated to form some
kind of barrier between the earth and the sun, causing a retention of heat.
Now, however,
having the scientific means of measuring the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, we
know that CO2 remains in the atmosphere, not for hundreds of years but only about
ten.
We also now know
that in order to prove the ‘science’ of global warming the famous or rather
infamous, ‘Hockey Stick Graph’ was faked by removing the much warmer than today
period of the middle-ages.
The IPCC having abandoned science in favour of computer model predictions, is now under attack from ever increasing numbers of the world’s
top scientists to demand that the UN’s IPCC be scrapped.
We also know the absurdity of suggesting that man can control the weather, a King named Canute once demonstrated the lunacy of such beliefs.
The percentage
of CO2 in the atmospheric make up is so minute that it cannot possibly affect
our weather. Man’s contribution of CO2 is so insignificant that if we stopped
producing it all together it would hardly be noticed.
Even the
environmental zealots have been forced to concede that if the world enacted the
Kyoto Protocol to the full, we mayat best, by the
end of the century, achieve a global temperature reduction of between 1
and 2 degrees, and which could reduce rising sea-levels, but not
by the nightmarish: forty-foot? as predicted by Al Gore’s horror flic, but by
about three inches and that's if their computer predictions prove correct.
We also know
that our neighbouring planets are heating and cooling as the same rate as the earth, but admitting that the sun controls our weather would demolish the CO2 mafia’s case – and their profits and power.
And there we
have it, the language of the junk science used by global warming/climate change
activists is peppered with, may’s, might’s, if’s , predictions,
and could possibly’s.
They give us
predictions by the million,
but few hard scientific facts. Even the threat to polar bears was a lie, for
according to The World Wildlife Foundation polar bears are doing quite nicely.
Polar bears of course had no problem surviving the much warmer period of the
middle ages either.
The cost to us
of implementing ‘environmental controls’ i.e. fines and tariffs will run into
many billions of dollars, and devastate our economies. The cost in human
lives will be counted in their millions.
For humanities sake refuse to accept
the ‘abnormal climate change hype’ as being scientific fact.
Remember too
that headlines sell newspapers, and projected disasters sell even better.
When reading
such reports check the body of the report to see if that eye catching headline
has been diluted in the main article by the use of: if, could, may,
possibly, prediction etc.
Carbon
Footprints?
Isn’t that what
the Emperor’s New Clothes were made of, non existent invisible material that
only the foolish couldn’t see?
I personally
have no objection to being thought foolish as I prefer it to being
brainwashed into believing a lie.
Tonyb
Buying one of my novels in ebook format will help keep this site going and give you a great read. Merlin’s
Granddaughter published November 2007 Different published January 2008 Killing Cat published March 2008
Lord of The Woods (Robin Hood of Nottingham) Episode 1 To be published may 2008 followed by two episodes per month thereafter.
