New Page 6
Carbon
Footprints - The Lunacy Prevails.
How the city
slickers, the Soros's, Rothschilds, Rockafellas of the financial world must be
sitting back and rubbing their hands with glee as their billions of dollar
fortunes allow them to dictate how the masses, that's you and I, live their
lives, day by day.
Not
surprisingly governments rush to the fore to claim their share of the prize but,
consider this:
The Ice Cores
prove that carbon dioxide follows 800 years – 2,000 years behind rises in
temperature, a point conceded in an English Court of Law by the makers of the
sci-fi horror movie, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’.
A few decades
ago it was widely believed in scientific circles, that CO2 remained in the
atmosphere for hundreds of years and must therefore, accumulate and form some
kind of shield between the earth and the sun causing a retention of heat and
‘greenhouse gasses’ were born.
Now, however,
having the scientific means of measuring the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, we
know that CO2 remains in the atmosphere, not for hundreds of years but for about
ten.
We also know
that in order to prove the ‘science’ of global warming the famous or rather
infamous, ‘Hockey Stick Graph’ was faked by removing the much warmer than today
period of the middle-ages.
The IPCC has
abandoned science in favour of computer model predictions and as a result of
which many of the world’s top scientists are demanding that the UN’s IPCC be
scrapped.
We also know
that man cannot control global weather and that the percentage of CO2 in the
atmospheric make up is so minute that it cannot possibly affect our weather.
Man’s contribution of CO2 is so insignificant that if we stopped producing it
all together it would hardly be noticed.
We also know
that our neighbouring planets are heating and cooling as the same rate as the
earth, but admitting that the sun controls our weather would demolish the CO2
mafia’s case – and their profits and power.
But even these
fake environmental zealots have been forced to reluctantly agree that if we
adhered to their dictates we may at best, by the end of the
century, achieve a global temperature reduction of between 1 and 2 degrees,
which could reduce rising sea-levels by: forty-foot? as predicted
by Al Gore’s movie, well no not quite, about three inches if
they’re right.
And there we
have it, the language of the junk science used by global warming/climate change
activists is peppered with, may’s, might’s, if’s , predictions, and could
possibly’s. Predictions by the million, but not cold hard scientific facts. Even
the threat to polar bears is a lie, for according to The World Wildlife
Foundation polar bears are doing quite nicely. Polar bears of course had no
problem surviving the much warmer period of the middle ages either.
The cost to us
of implementing ‘environmental controls’ i.e. fines and tariffs will run into
many billions of dollars, and devastate our economy. The cost in human live will
be counted in their millions.
Do not accept
‘abnormal climate change hype’ as being scientific fact.
Remember too
that headlines sell newspapers, and projected disasters sell even better.
When reading
such reports check the body of the report to see if that eye catching headline
has been diluted in the main article by the use of: if, could, may, possibly,
prediction etc.
Carbon
Footprints?
Isn’t that what
the Emperor’s New Clothes were made of, non existent invisible material that
only the foolish couldn’t see?
I personally
have no objection to being thought foolish, in fact I prefer to be thought a
fool, than stupid, and allowing myself to be brainwashed into believing in something that does not exist, such as anthropologival Global Warming.
Tonyb.
