As we enter March 2010, the
old saying, ‘Mad as a March Hare’ sprang to mind when reading the BBC News
headlines: Climate change
human link evidence 'stronger’By Pallab Ghosh, Science
correspondent, BBC News. 5th March 2010.
As usual with
the BBC’s reporting on Climate Change all was not as it seems, this is not some
exciting new scientific discovery, well how could it be when the IPCC abandoned
real climate change science over a decade ago, when they discovered scientific
fact did support the conclusions they had published.Instead they turned to ‘climate computer
models’, which are very conveniently restricted to the data fed into them.
What the anthropogenic global warming cowboys
are throwing their hats in the air over is an analysis published in the Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews
Climate Change Journal, by Dr
Peter Stott, of the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
Last year, 2009, the Moscow-based Institute
of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Centre for
Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office
in Exeter (Devon,
England) had
probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data
of stations located in large populated centres that are influenced by the
urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
Fact: Since 1995 the IPCC have reduced the
number of global weather stations from which data was collected, from 6,000 to
1500.
How any study of research known to be biased,
and conducted by an organisation accused of doctored its data, can be given any
credence beggars belief.
That the BBC published this rubbish as a
headline is an insult to the intelligence of us all.
I challenge Dr Stott, the Hadley Centre for
Climate Prediction and Research, the Met Office and the BBC to explain or
contest this:
This is one of the nine errors, the High
Court ruled, must be explained to children before being shownAl Gore’s film, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ in
schools.
The Government’s Chief Scientist had to
concede that the Ice-cores showed that over the last 650,000 years rises in CO2
lag behind rises in temperature by 800 - 2,000 years.
Al Gore had reversed the science.
Therefore, as the Government conceded, in the
High Court, that CO2 levels are dictated by global temperatures that prevailed
800 -2,000 years earlier, it must follow that today’s CO2 levels were also
dictated by the global temperatures of 800 -2,000 years ago; The Medieval Warm
Period.
It must also follow that CO2 rises cannot cause
rises in the global temperatures which preceded them.
Not only is anthropogenic global warming a
lie, but the entire climate change science of CO2 being responsible for climate
change is a deliberately manufactured lie, instigated by the UN during its
African Review as a method of wealth re-distribution.
