Press Release Dec 10, 2007
Press Release from
Science & Environmental Policy Project
10 December 2007
Contact: Dr S Fred Singer, President, SEPP singer@SEPP.org 703-920-2744
Climate warming is naturally caused and shows no human influence:
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant.
Climate
scientists at the University of Rochester, the University of Alabama,
and the University of Virginia report that observed patterns of
temperature changes (‘fingerprints’) over the last thirty years are not
in accord with what greenhouse models predict and can better be
explained by natural factors, such as solar variability. Therefore,
climate change is ‘unstoppable’ and cannot be affected or modified by
controlling the emission of greenhouse gases, such as CO2, as is
proposed in current legislation.
These
results are in conflict with the conclusions of the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and also with some
recent research publications based on essentially the same data. However, they are supported by the results of the US-sponsored Climate Change Science Program (CCSP).
The report is published in the December 2007 issue of the International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society [DOI: 10.1002/joc.1651]. The
authors are Prof. David H. Douglass (Univ. of Rochester), Prof. John R.
Christy (Univ. of Alabama), Benjamin D. Pearson (graduate student), and
Prof. S. Fred Singer (Univ. of Virginia).
The fundamental question is whether the observed warming is natural or anthropogenic (human-caused). Lead
author David Douglass said: “The observed pattern of warming, comparing
surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the
characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The
inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not
significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate
warming.”
Co-author
John Christy said: “Satellite data and independent balloon data agree
that atmospheric warming trends do not exceed those of the surface. Greenhouse models, on the other hand, demand that atmospheric trend values be 2-3 times greater. We have good reason, therefore, to believe that current climate models greatly overestimate the effects of greenhouse gases. Satellite
observations suggest that GH models ignore negative feedbacks, produced
by clouds and by water vapor, that diminish the warming effects of
carbon dioxide.”
Co-author
S. Fred Singer said: “The current warming trend is simply part of a
natural cycle of climate warming and cooling that has been seen in ice
cores, deep-sea sediments, stalagmites, etc., and published in hundreds
of papers in peer-reviewed journals. The
mechanism for producing such cyclical climate changes is still under
discussion; but they are most likely caused by variations in the solar
wind and associated magnetic fields that affect the flux of cosmic rays
incident on the earth’s atmosphere. In turn,
such cosmic rays are believed to influence cloudiness and thereby
control the amount of sunlight reaching the earth’s surface—and thus
the climate.” Our research demonstrates that the ongoing rise of atmospheric CO2 has only a minor influence on climate change. We must conclude, therefore, that attempts to control CO2 emissions are ineffective and pointless. – but very costly.
























































0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home