State Climatologists Attacked for
Global Warming Doubts
Published In: Environment and
Climate News (April)
Several state climatologists--researchers officially charged
with gathering, analyzing, and disseminating climate and weather information for
the states--are being pressured by global warming alarmists to silence or change
their skeptical views on global warming alarmism.
Pressure has reached the point of threatened job reprisals,
including removal from their positions, for state climatologists who continue to
cast doubt on global warming.
Governor Intervenes
Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D), for example, has confirmed he
wants to take the title of state climatologist away from Oregon State
University's George Taylor--a two-time president of the American Association of
State Climatologists. Taylor's offense, according to Kulongoski, is in asserting
that most of the small global warming we have seen in recent decades is the
result of natural climate variation.
Kulongoski fears Taylor's scientific opinion undermines the
state's stated goal of preventing global warming by reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.
State Sen. Brad Avakian (D-Beaverton), a Kulongoski ally, is
sponsoring a bill to give the governor the power to appoint the state
climatologist.
The state legislature created the position in 1991 as part of
a state climate office at Oregon State University. To avoid political
interference with the process, the legislature delegated the appointment of the
office to Oregon State University.
The university appointed Taylor to the position when it was
first created, and he has held the position since 1991. Avakian's bill would
change that.
Ignoring Science, Governor
In Delaware, State Climatologist David Legates is under fire
for joining several other authors in a friend-of-the-court brief against the
State of Delaware's legal efforts to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Legates
has argued there is a great deal of uncertainty concerning the extent to which
human activities are driving the recent warming cycle.
As a result of scientific doubts he has expressed regarding
global warming alarmism, the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control is seeking to remove Legates from office, even though the
University of Delaware currently evaluates state climatologist candidates and
makes appointment decisions based on scientific rather than political factors.
In an effort to end the controversy, Delaware Gov. Ruth Ann
Minner (D) sent a letter to Legates stating that while his views on warming
don't represent the position of the executive branch, the governor appreciates
his ongoing work and that of the state climate office.
Despite Minner's stated support, Legates said the Department
of Natural Resources is still attempting to have him removed.
Virginia Gov Pressures Prof
The disturbing developments in Oregon and Delaware follow on
the heels of similar intimidation in Virginia.
In late 2006 Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine (D) began an
investigation of Virginia State Climatologist and University of Virginia Prof.
Dr. Patrick Michaels. Michaels is a past president of the American Association
of State Climatologists and is widely cited as one of the most publicly visible
skeptics of the view that human actions are likely to cause a climate
catastrophe.
Michaels believes human actions, primarily fossil fuel use,
are contributing somewhat to the present warming, but he has argued that future
warming will be modest and is unlikely to result in serious harm to humans or
the environment.
Michaels' scientific conclusions have raised the ire of
environmental activists, prompting Kaine to investigate ways to remove him from
his position as state climatologist. When it became clear that Michaels worked
for the University of Virginia and not the governor, Kaine's office sent a
letter to Michaels asking him to make it clear that when he speaks or writes
about climate change he is speaking for himself and not for the state.
Scientists Concerned
Colorado State Climatologist Roger Pielke summarized on his
Web log the fear these recent developments have raised in the scientific
community. Calling the attempts to remove Taylor and Legates "unprecedented,"
Pielke wrote, "These are very chilling developments and should be resisted and
objected to by anyone who values the free expression of scientific views. ...
The use of governors to stifle alternative scientific views is what governments
have done in the past to suppress free speech.
"The move to remove them from their positions because they do
not espouse a particular viewpoint on climate change reflects negatively on the
politicians who are abusing their power to enforce their views," Pielke
continued. "Regardless of your perspective on the role of humans in the climate
system, their attempt to force political correctness on any science issue should
be vigorously repudiated."
Support Offered
Dan Simmons, director of the Natural Resources Task Force at
the American Legislative Exchange Council, condemned efforts by global warming
alarmists to squelch debate raised by state climatologists. In an interview for
this article, Simmons said, "In January, global warming alarmists charged that
the Bush administration is muzzling scientists, and yet they failed to complain
that at the state level alarmists are muzzling scientists with whom they
disagree. This politicization of science must stop."
Simmons added, "Those who want to muzzle scientists should be
ashamed of themselves. The scientific process should be about being able to
explore unpopular ideas, not conforming scientific views to match a particular
governor's point of view."
Also lending support for the continued independence of state
climatologists is U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R) of Oklahoma, ranking member and
former chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
Responding to the ongoing assault on state climatologists,
Inhofe stated, "Suppressing scientific debate by threatening state climatologist
positions, calling for Nuremberg-style trials and decertification of skeptics,
are all signs of a growing desperation by the global warming alarmists. Climate
skeptics continue to be vindicated as more and more scientists and policymakers
realize the inconvenient truth that global warming alarmism is unsustainable."
